LONDON – The UK Parliament could save an estimated £216,000 a year in ingredient costs by replacing 30% of the meat, fish and shellfish it buys with plant proteins such as beans, lentils, tofu and nuts, according to new economic analysis based on data released under Freedom of Information (FOI), commissioned by Humane World for Animals UK (formerly called Humane Society International UK).
The report, Could increasing plant-based catering in the Houses of Parliament save money? by economists Griffin Carpenter and Artūrs Kaņepājs, is being launched today (21 October 2026) at an event in the House of Commons. FOI data reveals that more than 92% of protein-rich food procured was from animal sources, including meat and fish, with less than 8% supplied by whole food plant proteins and minimally processed proteins such as beans, tofu and tempeh.
Campaigners from Humane World for Animals say the findings make a strong case for Parliament to follow the example set by other public bodies and proactively increase the proportion of plant proteins served.
This is the first analysis to model the cost savings of changing menus in the Palace of Westminster. Using list prices collected between July and October 2026, the analysis estimates that a modest 30% shift from animal proteins to whole food plant proteins would deliver annual ingredient savings of about £78,000 in the House of Lords and £138,000 in the House of Commons.
The change would put the Palace of Westminster on course to act in accordance with Climate Change Committee recommendations for a 25% reduction in total meat consumption by 2040, and also with the 2021 National Food Strategy’s recommended 30% reduction in meat consumption by 2032. The 30% reduction could cut emissions associated with Parliament’s animal protein purchases by about a quarter, around 650 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent a year.
The findings come as Parliament faces pressure to rein in catering costs. House of Commons catering recorded a £7.4 million loss in 2024-25, and the House of Commons Finance Committee has recommended that it reach zero net cost by the end of this Parliament. House of Lords catering had a net cost of about £2.8 million in the same year.
Claire Bass, senior director, campaigns and public affairs at Humane World for Animals UK said: “Parliament’s meat-heavy menus have a significant cost, to the public purse, our climate, and to animals suffering in factory farms. This report highlights the opportunity for Parliament to lead by example by putting better-value climate and animal-friendly plant-based food at the heart of its menus. Replacing 30% of the animal proteins Parliament buys with beans, lentils, tofu and nuts could save more than £200,000 a year. We know that there’s already appetite among many MPs to have more plants on plates; this is a clear opportunity for the Government to drive that shift across central government catering and save money, cut greenhouse gases and spare animals from suffering.”
Navendu Mishra, MP for Stockport and sponsor of the event said: “Parliament’s chefs, across the House of Commons and House of Lords catering departments, produce some excellent plant-based options, we simply need more of them because plant-based dishes can and should be enjoyed by all. This new report shows that a relatively small shift towards plant proteins could save money, and help stimulate market demand for British-grown beans and pulses. Updates to the Government Buying Standards for Food and Catering Services could create a positive mandate for central government catering to show leadership in protein diversification.”
Griffin Carpenter, co-author of the report, said: “While some manufactured substitutes are approaching price parity with processed meat, plant protein staples such as beans, lentils and tofu already offer ingredient-cost savings. Reformulating menus around these staples could reduce catering costs in both Houses and contribute to the Commons’ objective of operating without a taxpayer subsidy.”
A menu fit for a medieval banquet?
The FOI data reveal an overwhelmingly meat-heavy menu that reads more like a medieval banquet than the weekly shop of most UK households. Across the Parliamentary estate, purchases include beef, veal, lamb, wild boar, venison, rabbit and snails; game birds including pheasant, partridge, pigeon and quail; and an extensive range of fish and shellfish, from halibut and monkfish to lobster, oysters and squid. Over the 12-month period the House of Commons purchased 96 tonnes of meat, fish and shellfish, while the House of Lords purchased 36 tonnes. In the House of Lords, about three tonnes of bacon, gammon, and ham were purchased, against two kilograms of seitan. Similarly, the House of Commons purchased about 20 tonnes of raw chicken cuts but less than one tonne (954kg) of tofu.
Plant protein choice determines cost-saving potential
The report compares like-for-like manufactured substitutes, such as plant-based mince, with dishes redesigned around lower-cost plant protein whole foods including pulses, tofu, tempeh and nuts. The central finding is that savings come from redesigning dishes around these staples, not from swapping meat for manufactured substitutes.
-
Across both Houses, purchase costing estimates savings of 57p per £1 spent on meat, fish and shellfish replaced with plant protein staples; recipe costing estimates savings of 50p per £1.
-
In the Lords, ingredients for an average animal-based dish cost £2.04 per serving, compared with £1.42 for a redesigned plant-based dish.
-
In purchase costing, replacing 30% of animal proteins with manufactured substitutes would add about £25,000 a year in the Lords and £83,000 in the Commons.
-
Across the 27 compared Lords dishes, reformulated versions and manufactured substitutes have estimated emissions 80–83% below the original dishes per serving.
Public caterers are already showing what works
The report reviews case studies of plant-forward catering programmes in government, hospitals, schools, universities and local authorities in the UK and globally. Where costs were reported, redesigned menus were cheaper or cost-neutral, or maintained commercial performance. The strongest examples combined menu redesign with chef training, phased implementation and close monitoring of take-up and waste.
Meeting demand with a practical first step
A 2025 YouGov survey of 105 MPs weighted to represent the Commons found that almost a quarter (24%) described themselves as reducing meat consumption; 15% were flexitarian or pescatarian; 3% were vegetarian or vegan. 38% expressed a preference for a higher proportion of nutritious plant-based options to be offered in parliamentary catering, rising to 53% amongst Labour MPs.
The report concludes that testing dishes with diners and monitoring purchase prices, uptake and waste would help establish how far the modelled savings hold in practice.
Humane World for Animals runs plant-based culinary training Forward Food for public sector caterers and has offered free tailored support sessions to Parliament’s chefs.
ENDS
Notes to editors
-
The report, Could increasing plant-based catering in the Houses of Parliament save money? Using Parliament’s purchase records, sales records, and menus to assess ingredient costs and climate impacts, was written by Griffin Carpenter and Artūrs Kaņepājs for Humane World for Animals UK and is dated 21 October 2026.
-
The data come from House of Lords FOI 4825 and House of Commons FOI F26-355, covering the 2024-25 financial year, plus published Commons sales data. Prices are list prices excluding VAT, collected between July and October 2026. The headline figures are for a 30% switch. The report also models 20% and 50%.
-
The headline savings are estimates of ingredient costs at list prices, not at the prices Parliament pays. They exclude labour, energy and waste, and assume that menu prices and sales volumes stay the same. Savings depend on the dishes chosen, the prices paid and diner uptake.
-
The combined figures in this release (£216,000 in savings, around 650 tonnes of CO2e and £211,000 in carbon value) are the sum of the separate Lords and Commons estimates in the report.
-
The Commons recipe estimates depend heavily on sales lines allocated to dishes by assumption. Some replacements fall below the 80% protein aim; those retaining at least 50% are included, while those below 50% are not modelled. Foods without a modelled replacement remain unchanged. The report discusses these limitations in full.
-
The carbon valuation uses the UK Government's central carbon value.